Grupe v. Glick
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
A judgment for damages followed findings that oil refining equipment sold by Fred P. Glick, doing business as Fabriform Steel Products Company, did not operate as represented by him. Upon the appeal from that judgment, the principal questions presented for determination concern the measure of damages to be applied and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings as to certain amounts of damage sustained by the purchaser.
It appears that three machines which the appellants sold to George G. Grupe, Jr., upon representations that they would re-refine oil, were not properly designed or…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Passinger v. . ThorburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Lambert v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.