Legal Opinion

American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1995No. B088343PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

Where class-action plaintiffs allege they have suffered no personal injury or property damage from a vehicle they claim is defectively designed, and it is impliedly conceded that their vehicles have—since the date of purchase—remained fit for their ordinary purpose, can plaintiffs state a cause of action in breach of implied warranty? We conclude they cannot, and that the superior court erred in certifying for class treatment plaintiffs’ implied warranty claims, and in thereafter refusing to decertify the class.

Petitioner, American Suzuki Motor Corporation (Suzuki) seeks a writ…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lloyd v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Birdsong v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API