Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
Plaintiff Jess Mexia sued Rinker Boat Company, Inc. (Rinker), and Miller’s Landing (Miller) for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.) (the Song-Beverly Act). In essence, Mexia alleged that he purchased from Miller a boat manufactured by Rinker that was unmerchantable due to a latent defect, which subsequently caused the boat’s engine to corrode. He commenced his action within four years after purchasing the boat.
In support of their demurrer to the complaint, Rinker and Miller asserted that…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- McCall v. PacifiCare of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- Margie Daniel v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Cholakyan v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- MacDonald v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.