Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Grogan

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1911No. Civ. No. 1013PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

In this action plaintiff had judgment for an amount of money which constituted only a small part of the sum demanded. He appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

On November 26, 1909, the plaintiff, who was the owner' of an olive orchard located at Sespe, in the county of Ventura, California, made a contract to sell the crop of olives then growing upon the trees to the defendant. A written contract was signed by the parties at the time which expressed in brief form the agreement of Kenney to sell and Grogan to buy the olives, it being stated therein that the purchase was made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Walti v. GabaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Bill v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Browning v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Klein v. Asgrow Seed Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. MacRae v. HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Moore v. Hubbard & Johnson Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Lamb v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API