Legal Opinion

Holmes Packaging MacH. Corp. v. Bingham

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1967No. Civ. 23357PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.

In this action brought by plaintiff, Holmes Packaging Machinery Corp., to recover from defendant, Byrum C. Bingham, money allegedly due in the form of rent under two leases of personal property, further to recover attorney’s fees under these agreements, and finally to have the respective rights of the parties under these agreements determined, Holmes appeals from a judgment in favor of Bingham. The basis of the trial court’s judgment being that Bingham was entitled to rescind the leases because of Holmes’ breach of implied warranties that the property leased thereunder was of merchantable…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Price v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. All-States Leasing Company v. BassIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Patriot General Life Insurance v. CFC Investment Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Metowski v. Traid Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API