Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Iliff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 21, 1992No. C6-91-2041PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a hearing, respondent Thomas L. Iliff was found to have violated several Rules of Professional Conduct in his representation of clients in a claim for property damage. The matter is now before us on the referee’s report and recommendation of an indefinite suspension with right to apply for reinstatement (with probation) after 1 year.

Respondent was admitted to the Minnesota bar in 1974. He is a sole practitioner. In April 1986, respondent was retained by two property owners to negotiate settlement of a claim against a developer who had mistakenly removed a swath of trees from their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuhlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against FlanerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SimmondsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Matter of Discipline of BernsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WinterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. In Re the Discipline of HartkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against EdingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MilloySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against KossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API