Legal Opinion

In Re the Discipline of Hartke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1995No. C5-86-1996PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition and amended petition with this court, alleging that Respondent, Jerrold M. Hartke, committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline. In the petitions, the Director alleges four counts of improper conduct involving several clients: (1) mishandling of client funds; (2) conflict of interest; (3) continuing pattern of neglect; and (4) failure to honor a fee arbitration. The Honorable Harlan L. Nelson conducted a referee hearing on the petitions on March 17,18, and 19, 1994. On April 22, 1994 the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RuffenachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth F. DolezalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SmolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PinottiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API