Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ruhland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1989No. C4-88-1914PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises from a disciplinary complaint brought against respondent, Douglas A. Ruhland, alleging, among other misconduct, that he failed to pay funds to an opposing party as directed by a court order. Following the filing of a disciplinary petition by the director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, a hearing was held on January 4-5, 1989, before a court-appointed referee. The referee issued findings of fact and conclusions of law and found that respondent’s conduct had violated Rules 8.4(c) and (d) of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct and recommended that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SimmondsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. In Re LordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KarlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HougeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API