Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Simmonds

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1987No. C7-86-879PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Following a contested hearing on a petition filed by the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (LPRB) charging appellant John E. Simmonds with professional misconduct, a referee appointed by this court made findings of fact and conclusions of law essentially finding the allegations of the Director’s petition to be true and holding that appellant’s conduct had violated several disciplinary rules governing the conduct of lawyers admitted to practice in Minnesota. The referee recommended that appellant be suspended from the practice of law for six months; that…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against FrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. In Re KutnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuhlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against DvorakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GeigerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against IliffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API