Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Winter
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 2009No. A08-1014PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On June 18, 2008, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) filed a petition charging respondent Barton Carl Winter with one count of professional misconduct. The petition alleges that Winter knowingly made a false statement of fact to a tribunal and to another attorney in the course of representing a client and failed to correct the false statement. Winter answered the petition, and a hearing was held before a referee appointed by the court pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). After the hearing, the referee found…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- COMPEANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MichaelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Disciplinary Action Against SeaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- In re Disciplinary Action Against LetourneauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.