L. W. Blinn Lumber Co. v. County of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON,. J.
Appeal by plaintiff from judgment for defendants in an action to recover taxes for the year 1924, paid under protest (sec. 3819, Pol. Code), upon a possessory, or leasehold, interest in tide lands owned by the City of Los Angeles. Said judgment rests- upon findings of fact and conclusions of law, the substance of which will now be set forth: .
The court found that in 1917, as the result of the settlement and compromise of litigation between the City of Los Angeles and the Southern Pacific Railroad, the city leased certain tide lands to the railroad without the specification of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Mahoney v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Forster Shipbuilding Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Parr-Richmond Industrial Corp. v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.