Legal Opinion

Hammond Lumber Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1930No. Docket No. 7235PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in favor of defendant in this action brought to recover the amount of a tax levied on plaintiff’s possessory interest as a tenant of real property and paid under protest.

Since May, 1923, the plaintiff has been in possession of certain harbor lands, comprising about twenty-five acres, with a water frontage of about 2,500 feet, owned by the city of Los Angeles and rented by the city to plaintiff for use in plaintiff’s lumber business under a permit in the nature of a lease running to June 3, 1951, the annual rental until June 3, 1931,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Kaiser Co. v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API