Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1912No. L.A. No. 2560PublishedCited by 70 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Walter Bordwell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial in an action brought by plaintiff to recover $11,728.12 state and county taxes paid by plaintiff under protest for the fiscal year 1906-7. The judgment was in favor of plaintiff for the full amount claimed.

The amount sought to be recovered was a portion of the taxes paid by plaintiff upon certain tangible assets, such as its gas-pipes, meters, regulators, electric service, poles, wire, electric underground system, gasworks plant, electric works plant, etc., and was the amount claimed to have…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. County of Los Angeles v. BallerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  5. San Jose Gas Co. v. JanuaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API