Legal Opinion

Forster Shipbuilding Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1960No. L. A. 25668PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

This appeal tests the constitutionality of section 107.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which prescribes methods for evaluating the possessory interests of lessees of tax-exempt property. L. W. Blinn Lbr. Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 216 Cal. 474 [14 P.2d 512], held that when such interests are evaluated by the capitalization of income method, deductions should be made from gross income for rentals to become due under the lease and for amortization of the cost of improvements by the lessee that would revert to the lessor. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San Diego, 45 Cal.2d 546 [290 P.2d…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Danskin v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In Re LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API