Legal Opinion

Kaiser Co. v. Reid

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1947No. S. F. 17377PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff seeks by this action to secure the refund of taxes levied upon its possessory interest as a tenant of Richmond Shipyards Nos. 3 and 3-A and paid by it under protest for the tax year 1943-1944. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 5138.) There are two causes of action involved: the first concerns the payment of the tax levied by the county of Contra Costa in the sum of $25,136.06, and the second concerns the payment of the tax levied by the city of Richmond in the sum of $18,083.20. The United States has intervened in support of plaintiff by reason of its agreement to reimburse plaintiff for all…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. BRET HARTE INN, INC v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API