Legal Opinion

Chilberg v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1942No. Civ. 12034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the action following the sustaining of their demurrer without leave to amend.

On October 31, 1938, plaintiffs executed a deed to the city of Los Angeles conveying an easement of right of way for an electric transmission line across a half section of land owned by them in consideration of a payment of $50. Plaintiffs claim they were induced to sign the deed through misrepresentation, fraud and deceit; that had they known the real facts they would not have done so; that they were inexperienced in business and legal…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Chesney v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Thompson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Farnsworth & Ruggles, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API