Chilberg v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the action following the sustaining of their demurrer without leave to amend.
On October 31, 1938, plaintiffs executed a deed to the city of Los Angeles conveying an easement of right of way for an electric transmission line across a half section of land owned by them in consideration of a payment of $50. Plaintiffs claim they were induced to sign the deed through misrepresentation, fraud and deceit; that had they known the real facts they would not have done so; that they were inexperienced in business and legal…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Chesney v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Thompson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Farnsworth & Ruggles, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957