Legal Opinion

Eastlick v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1947No. L. A. 19746PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant city of Los Angeles appeals from a judgment entered upon a verdict of $5,000 in favor of plaintiff for personal injuries sustained when she tripped and fell on a broken sidewalk within defendant’s territorial limits.

The accident occurred on Cannery Street, Terminal Island, in the Harbor District of the city of Los Angeles. Cannery Street extends east and west and is 100 feet wide between property lines. It is intersected by Tuna Street, which extends north and south and is 40 feet wide. The condition of the sidewalk of Cannery Street, which was alleged to have been dangerous and to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Douglass v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mann v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API