Legal Opinion

United States v. Strauss

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 23, 1925No. 2514PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The collector classified the merchandise involved herein as toys, and assessed same for duty át 70 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1414 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Dolls, and parts of dolls, doll heads, toy marbles, of whatever materials composed, air rifles, toy balloons, toy books without reading matter other than letters, numerals, or descriptive words, bound or unbound,‘and parts thereof, garlands, festooning and Christmas-tree decorations made wholly or in chief value of tinsel wire, lame or lahn, bullions or metal threads, and all other toys and parts of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. Globe Overseas Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. AndrewsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. Woolworth Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Louis Wolf & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. International Navigation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. United States v. Cottman Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  5. United States v. SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API