Louis Wolf & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Presiding Judge:
The merchandise involved in this suit (represented bj exhibits 1, 2, and 3) is described on the invoice as “World Fair Dolls.” Two of these articles are hollow celluloid figures. Exhibit 1 is approximately 4}( inches in height; exhibit 2 about 6 inches. Exhibit 3 is a floppy cotton article about 12 inches in length, with a celluloid head. All these figures are colored and are manufactured so as to simulate a military uniform, with the World's Fair insignia of the “Perisphere” and “Trylon” on the hat.
The dolls were assessed under the respective provisions therefor in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. BeierleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. StraussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Pressner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- United States v. SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Von Bremen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3Cited by11 opinions
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Barum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Pressner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.