United States v. Globe Overseas Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
The merchandise involved in this appeal -was invoiced as “novelty sponges." It was described by the appraiser as “novelty rubber sponges in the form of dogs, Santa Claus, clowns, etc., in the opinion of this office suitable only for the amusement of children. ” It was returned by the appraiser, and assessed for duty by the collector, as toys, at 70 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 1414, of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:
Par. 1414. Dolls, and parts of dolls, doll heads, toy marbles, * * * and all other toys, and parts of toys, not composed of china,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Masson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. StraussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Lamont v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- Ideal Toy Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Pez Haas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.