Legal Opinion

New York Merchandise Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 20, 1969No. C.D. 3671PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This case involves the proper classification of imported merchandise which was invoiced as “vinyl baseball gloves,” and more particularly described as “914" x 7%" Vinyl Junior Baseball Glove.” It was classified by the collector under item 737.90 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (19 U.S.C. § 1202) as other toys, *39not specially provided for, and assessed with duty at 35 percent ad valorem.

Plaintiff’s claim is that the importation is properly classifiable under ■ item 734.55 of the tariff schedules as “Baseball equipment and parts thereof,” dutiable at 15 percent ad…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Fred Bronner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ero Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. Montgomery Ward v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Processed Plastic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  4. Simon Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  5. Stonewall Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API