Legal Opinion

Woolworth Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 13, 1922No. 2102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, T. D. 38697 (G. A. 8427).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Presiding Judge

These importations were of Christmas-tree ornaments, some of individual colored' glass balls, with ring attached by which they could be suspended, some in the form of a number of colored glass globular or oval articles loosely strung together, and some of bead-*218like colored glass balls wired together in strings. The classifications for dutiable purposes by the collectors classifying the same were, in so far as herein concerned, in part under the provisions of paragraph 84 of the current tariff act as colored glass articles, and in part under paragraph 333 of said act as beaded articles. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Thanhauser v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. StraussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Central Warehouse Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Shallus Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API