Legal Opinion

Illfelder v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 30, 1910No. 112PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Transferred from the United States Circiut Court for the Southern District of New York, G. A. 6885 (T. D. 29625.)

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

A mixture of iron filings, magnesium, aluminum, nitrate of barium, and gum, in proportions not disclosed by the record, attached to a *110thin strip of metal or wood to serve as a handle, constitutes an article of merchandise known as “sparklers” or “sparklets.” When ignited by a lighted match or by scratching a match-like preparation with which the end of some of the “sparklers” is fitted, a vigorous combustion of the magnesium and iron filings is immediately set up, followed by a display of brilliant sparks, stars, and scintillations. The combustion of the metallic components of the merchandise…

2Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. StraussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API