Legal Opinion

United States v. Field

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 6, 1925No. 2441PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal by the Government from the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers sustaining the importers’ protest to the collector’s classification of merchandise described as “tenpins and ninepins.”

A set of tenpins consists of ten wooden pins and three wooden balls. The pins are* 6 inches in height and from l}4 to 2 inches in width at the base. The balls are about 3 inches in diameter.

A set of ninepins consists of nine wooden pins and three wooden balls, of the same dimensions respectively as the tenpins.

The merchandise was assessed for duty by the collector, as toys, at 70 per cent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. United States v. StraussCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Western Stamping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Poynter Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Mego Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API