Legal Opinion

Draper v. Grant

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1949No. Civ. 3786PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Petitioner had been confined in the Coalinga City Jail on some charge and was subsequently charged in a complaint issued by respondent, W. H. Grant, Judge of the City Court of Coalinga, with the “crime of misdemeanor” in that he “did wilfully and unlawfully destroy and injure certain parts of the Coalinga City Jail, to wit: did break and injure a water basin and 2 water faucets causing water to flood the jail to the extent that 2 mattresses were ruined. Time 11 p. m. All of which is contrary to the form, force and effect of section 606 of the Penal Code ...”

The docket of the court shows that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In Re MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. People v. BorenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Hutchison v. Reclamation District No. 1619California Court of Appeal · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wenzler v. Municipal Court for the Pasadena Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Starsky v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Castanon v. Long Beach Lesbian etc. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API