Legal Opinion · Dissent

California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel Board

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1995No. S041269Published

1Dissent

ARABIAN, J., Dissenting.

The essential question presented is whether the statutory time period within which the State Personnel Board (Board) must act is mandatory and jurisdictional or merely “directory.” A corollary issue is whether, when the Board has failed to act in a timely fashion, an employee bears the burden in a subsequent mandamus proceeding to establish that the employing agency’s action is unjustified.

Contrary to the majority, I would hold that the Court of Appeal correctly interpreted the governing statute to conclude that the statutory time frame is mandatory and jurisdictional.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API