Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Murphy

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1923No. Crim. No. 2466PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDawlor, J.

Petitioner, Della Murphy, instituted this proceeding to secure the release of one John H. Murphy, who was convicted of a misdemeanor in violating Ordinance No. 1857 (New Series) of the city and county of San Francisco by operating an automobile in a careless and reckless manner upon a street in the said city and county, and who was sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for fifty days. A writ of habeas corpus was issued by this court and it is now contended that the said ordinance is unconstitutional and void on the ground that it is in conflict with the provisions of the Motor Vehicle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Ex parte MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. In Re Estate of MunroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Ex Parte Henry Turner, On Habeas CorpusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Mervynne v. AckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API