Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Reclamation District No. 1619

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1927No. Docket No. 5658PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Plaintiff sued in mandamus to compel the defendants to draw and issue to plaintiff their warrant upon the funds of the defendant Reclamation District in payment of a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the District in the sum of $2,116, and interest, rendered on July 10, 1922, and becoming final on July 28, 1924. The defendants answered pleading the former judgment in bar to plaintiff’s right to mandamus and also pleading the bar of the statute of limitations. Judgment went for the defendants on both issues and the plaintiff has appealed upon a typewritten record.

In support of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. United States Ex Rel. Turner v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Dowell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. May v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API