Legal Opinion
Wenzler v. Municipal Court for the Pasadena Judicial District
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 16, 1965No. Civ. 27831PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, P. J.
— This proceeding in mandamus was begun by a petition filed in the superior court. That court made a minute order in these words: “The petitioner’s application for the issuance of an alternative writ of mandate is hereby denied. ’ ’ Petitioner 1 deems this to be a final order denying his petition and has therefore appealed therefrom under the authority of Steen v. Board of Civil Service Comrs., 26 Cal.2d 716, 727 [160 P.2d 816],
The petition names as respondents “Municipal Court of the Pasadena Judicial District; Hon. Joseph A. Sprankle, Jr., Judge of the Municipal Court of Pasadena Judicial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Elevator Operators & Starters' Union v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- McPherson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Shaw v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- McDonald v. Stockton Metropolitan Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Canova v. Trustees of Imperial Irrigation District Employee Pension PlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Best v. California Apprenticeship CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Old Town Dev. Corp. v. Urban Renewal Agency of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.