Legal Opinion

Anderson & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 2, 1921No. 2087PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 44031.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Three thousand sets of barrel staves and 3,000 sets of barrel heads, designed to be made up into lime barrels in this country, and 1,885 sets of barrel staves and 1,885 sets of barrel heads, intended to be made up into fish barrels, imported at the port of Seattle, Wash., were treated as entireties and were accordingly held by the collector of customs to be barrels in a “ knocked-down” condition. The merchandise, however was classified as a manufacture of wood and assessed for duty at 15 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 176 of the tariff act of 1913, which paragraph, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Jackson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. HaakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. United States v. OuterbridgeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Pan American Airways, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  3. Seideman Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API