Legal Opinion

United States v. Wanamaker

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 16, 1929No. 3127PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

The imported merchandise consists of pieces of cotton canvas, stamped with designs in various colors, and silk yarn and wool yarn, in corresponding colors, intended to be embroidered over the designs. Each bundle of yarn — silk or wool, as the case may be — was imported with the particular canvas on which it was designed to be used. When, by the use of the yarn, the design on the canvas has been embroidered, the embroidered article is used for making hand bags, bell pulls, hassocks, and cushion, chair, and bench covers. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Field & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. Anderson & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  2. United Merchandising Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Universal Foreign Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Harding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  5. Marset, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API