Legal Opinion

Seideman Products Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 24, 1949No. C. D. 1161Published

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise at issue in this action consists of tin cans imported as containers of tuna fish in oil. The tin cans were assessed with duty at the rate applicable to the tuna fish, to wit, 22 K per centum ad valorem under paragraph 718 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the trade agreeifient with Mexico, T. D. 50797.

The plaintiff claims that the tin cans are entitled to free entry under the provisions of paragraph 1615, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, as American goods returned, not advanced in value; or as containers of domestic manufacture,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Denike v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. Rubelli's SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Anderson & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  4. J. D. Richardson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API