Legal Opinion

Jackson Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 23, 1912No. 693PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7218 (T. D. 31566).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

This appeal raises the question of the classification for customs purposes of certain cast-iron linings for mantels and fireplaces. The merchandise was returned by the appraiser as a manufacture of metal, and accordingly it was assessed for duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York at 45 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 199 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, which paragraph reads as follows:

199. Articles or wares not specially provided for in this section, composed wholly or in part of iron, steel, lead, copper, nickel, pewter, zinc, gold, silver,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Isaacs v. JonasSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Park & Tilford v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  5. Wanner v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. James Betesh Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Trans Atlantic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API