Legal Opinion

United States v. Outerbridge

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 31, 1916No. 1607PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38248.

1Opinion of the Court

De Vries, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

In December, 1912, the Downey Shipyard & Marine Co., of Brooklyn, N. Y., contracted with the Bermuda Transportation Co., of Ber*224muda, to build for them a steel vessel fully equipped with machinery and general outfit. The boat was constructed at the Downey Shipyard & Marine Co.’s yards at Brooklyn, N. Y., and was named the Princess. The Bermuda Transportation Co. is a corporation organized under the laws of Bermuda. The merchandise here in question was ordered by the building company from Plenty & Son (Ltd.), Newbury, England, and duly imported…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  5. United States v. Auto Import Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Janson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. HannevigCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. United States v. Richard & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. Anderson & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  5. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API