Legal Opinion

United States v. Haaker

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 28, 1913No. 1130PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 31434 (T. D. 33217).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal as presented to the court addresses a challenge to a decision of the Board of General Appraisers upon the grounds *509chiefly that there is no evidence in the record to support it. The merchandise consisted of a monument now erected and standing in a cemetery at Caldwell, N. J., constituted of a winged figure of a woman upon a pedestal made of a square shaft with a carved capital and base. The figure was classified.by the collector at the port of New York as “ sculptures ” within paragraph 470 of the tariff act of 1909, while the pedestal was classified as a manufacture of marble…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. James Betesh Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Trans Atlantic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. Marks v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Selsi Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. W. A. Force & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API