Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Morse

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The respondents, who were the plaintiffs in the Circuit Court, have suggested that this appeal should be dismissed because the defendants who do not appeal were not served with notice of appeal. None of those defendants appeared in this .suit. Only the parties appearing are entitled to be served with notice of appeal: Section 550, Or. L.

The demurrer to the complaint is predicated on the theory that the contract upon which it is based is void in these particulars: (a) That Eli K. Anderson, one of the vendors, was dead and the other vendor, Elizabeth N. Anderson, had conveyed her interest in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Moore v. GieseckeTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Security Savings Co. v. MackenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blondell v. BeamOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Atkochunas v. GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Lea v. BloklandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Drake Lumber Co. v. LindquistOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. McCracken v. Walnut Park Garage, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API