Sheehan v. McKinstry
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
The first matter affirmatively alleged in McKinstry’s separate answer is that the plaintiff granted an extension of time to pay the stipulated installments under a provision in the contract which provides that “in the event of financial depression, panic or reverse circumstances,” making it impossible for McKinstry to make any of the payments stipulated, the plaintiff shall, upon request, grant an extension of one year within which such payments may be made. No testimony was offered, either to support or contradict this contention. In the state of the record, the original pleadings not being…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Mitchell v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Security Savings Co. v. MackenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Sayre v. MohneyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Cunningham v. FriendlyOregon Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Reedsport v. HUBBARD ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Blondell v. BeamOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Bend v. Title & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Rush v. AnestosIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.