Legal Opinion
Drake Lumber Co. v. Lindquist
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1946PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
This suit was instituted by Drake Lumber Company, a corporation, against. Hugh Lind- quist and Zoe Lindquist, husband and wife; Charles L. Doll and Janet A. Doll, husband and wife; Paget Mortgage Company, a corporation, and others, to foreclose a materialman’s lien. The only defendants to appear in the proceeding were Charles L. Doll and Janet A. Doll, his wife, and the Paget Mortgage Company, hereinafter referred to as the defendants. Prom a decree awarding plaintiff judgment against defendánt Hugh Lindquist in the sum of $1,469.92, with interest, and dismissing the suit so as to all the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Metcalf v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Henry & Coatsworth Co. v. FisherdickNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Osborn v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Fitzgerald Cotton Oil Co. v. Farmers Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Von Schmidt Dredge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Timber Structures, Inc. v. C. W. S. Grinding & MacHine WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Drake Lumber Co. v. Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Anderson v. Chambliss Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
- American Buildings Co. v. Wheelers StoresWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Halverson v. HagemanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.