Legal Opinion

Security Savings Co. v. Mackenzie

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1898PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From Multnomah : Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. Bill by the Security Savings and Trust Company against William Mackenzie to bar the latter’s interest under a certain contract to convey real estate. There was a decree for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is a suit commenced April 13, 1895, to foreclose the equitable interest of an obligee in a bond for a deed of real estate. The complaint alleges that on October *21015,1894, John Hale and wife, who were then the owners and in possession of the property in question, conveyed the same to the plaintiff, and that it immediately entered into, and ever since has been in, possession, thereof, and that the defendant wrongfully claims an estate therein adverse to the plaintiff, by reason of a bond for a deed executed by Hale and wife to him in July, 1891, whereby they covenanted and agreed to convey…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Button v. SchroyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  2. McIndoe v. MormanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Freeson v. . BissellNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Morris v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Shaw v. HeiseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Blondell v. BeamOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Renard v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API