Legal Opinion

Blondell v. Beam

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1966PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWAB, J. (Pro Tempore).

Plaintiffs brought suit to enforce the strict foreclosure clause of a land sale contract. They appeal from a decree denying foreclosure in any form and reinstating the contract upon payment by the vendees of past due taxes. The issue is whether a court of equity has the power to deny relief to a vendor in the face of proof of a material default not waived by vendor; or whether the court’s power to do equity is restricted to the exercise of discretion in determining what form of relief shall be granted. We conclude that the rule in Oregon has been and should continue…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. McKinstryOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Sievers v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cornely v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Higinbotham v. FrockOregon Supreme Court · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Laurette R. Raymond v. Riegel Textile CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  2. Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. In Re CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
  4. Kincaid v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Brown v. BabcockOregon Supreme Court · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API