Legal Opinion
Alaska Railroad v. Native Village of Eklutna
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 2002No. S-9277PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Dameo Paving Corporation operated a commercial rock quarrying operation under a licensing agreement at the Alaska Railroad Corporation's quarry in Eklutna. The superior court enjoined its operations after the adjacent Native Village of Eklutna and several of its residents filed suit alleging that Dameo was operating a quarry in violation of the applicable zoning ordinances of the Municipality of Anchorage. Because the superi- or court did not err in finding that the zoning *590ordinances applied to the Dameo operations, we affirm the injunction prohibiting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hancock v. TrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blackburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- North Kenai Peninsula Road Maintenance Service Area v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Campbell v. City Council of LynnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smallwood v. Central Peninsula General HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Native Village of Eklutna v. Alaska RailroadAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Alaska Railroad Corp. v. Native Village of EklutnaAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Spinell Homes, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Pima County v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.