Pima County v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Pima County challenges the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. Pima County claims the trial court erred by concluding that the billboards Clear Channel erected to replace billboards removed pursuant to condemnation were exempt from Pima County’s building and zoning regulations and that Pima County was bound by issue preclusion because of a prior memorandum decision of this court. Because we conclude Clear Channel’s billboards are not exempt from the regulations and Pima County is not bound by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Link v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Board of Regents of the Universities & State College v. City of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ammer v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Antonio P. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008