Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Train

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 7, 1976No. 74-220PublishedCited by 265 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The question for decision in this case is whether a State whose federally approved implementation plan forbids an air contaminant source to operate without a state permit may require existing federally owned or operated installations to secure such a permit. The case presents an issue of statutory construction requiring examination of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1857 et seq., and its legislative history in light of established constitutional principles governing the determination of whether and the extent to which federal installations have been subjected to state regulation.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by265 opinions

  1. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States Department of Energy v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. North Dakota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Blackburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

260 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API