Legal Opinion

Alaska Railroad Corp. v. Native Village of Eklutna

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2006No. S-11619PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Alaska Railroad wishes to remove granite rock from a quarry on culturally significant land located in the Native Village of Eklutna. In a 2004 decision, we concluded that the legislature did not clearly indicate its intention to exempt the Railroad from municipal zoning laws when it enacted the Alaska Railroad Corporation Act, and that the Railroad must apply for a conditional use permit before it may operate the Eklutna quarry. Following that decision, the Alaska Railroad Board enacted an emergency regulation allowing it to remove rock from the quarry…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Burke v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Barber v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Alaska Railroad Corp. v. Native Village of EklutnaAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Barber v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API