Legal Opinion
Spinell Homes, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 2003No. S-10546PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A homebuilding company challenges conditions the Municipality of Anchorage imposed on the issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy for certain homes. Because the Anchorage Municipal Code gave the municipality the authority to impose the challenged conditions, we affirm the decision of the superior court denying the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to the municipality. _
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Spinell Homes, Inc. constructs houses on property it acquires; it then sells the completed homes to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hageland Aviation Services, Inc. v. HarmsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Safar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Anderson Creek Partners, L.P. v. Cnty. of HarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- Anderson Creek Partners, L.P. v. Cnty.of HarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- PF Dev. Grp., LLC v. Cnty. of HarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.