Legal Opinion

Smallwood v. Central Peninsula General Hospital

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2006No. S-11585, S-11406PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The main question here is whether John L. Smallwood, a Medicaid recipient treated at Central Peninsula General Hospital, can sue the hospital to enforce Medicaid billing standards, particularly the “balance billing” prohibition that prevents billing for amounts (apart from authorized copayments) exceeding those reimbursable under Medicaid. We conclude that Smallwood is a third-party beneficiary of the provider agreement between the hospital and the state; he can therefore sue to enforce the balance billing prohibition. We also conclude that he has a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Doris Holbrook v. Henry C. Pitt, and Third-Party v. Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Third- PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Easyriders Freedom F.I.G.H.T. v. HanniganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Ennen v. Integon Indemnity Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Adkins v. CollensAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Alaska Interstate Construction, LLC v. Pacific Diversified Investments, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Pepper v. Routh Crabtree, APCAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API