Brown v. Board of Supervisors
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Turk street, in the city and county of San Francisco, between Masonic avenue on the east and St. Joseph’s avenue on the west, was originally laid out with a width of one hundred feet. The board of supervisors of said city and county passed an order April 19, 1897, declaring the northerly thirty-one feet and three inches of said portion of Turk street to be closed and vacated. The appellants herein are owners of lands abutting upon the southerly side of said portion of the street, and instituted the present proceeding for a review of this action of the board of supervisors and a judgment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Coster v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Davis v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Stetson v. Chicago & Evanston RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Customer Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.