Harman v. City and County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
In this taxpayer’s suit we are asked to determine if San Francisco may properly sell its vacated streets, burdened with private easements of ingress and egress, for 50 percent of their unencumbered fee value. We hold that, because the value of such easements in all of the city’s streets are not uniform, the city’s arbitrary reduction of 50 percent of the value of the vacated street in fixing the sales price violates its charter duty to obtain 90 percent of the rationally determined market value of all public property offered for sale.
Pursuant to the authority granted in the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Weatherford v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.