Legal Opinion

Kelso v. Ulrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1945No. Civ. 14652PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

On June 15, 1943, plaintiffs were the owners of a homesite lot in the city of Los Angeles. On that day the defendant Harry F. Ulrich by a writing contracted for the purchase of the property on the following terms, to wit: To pay two notes secured by trust deeds upon the premises in the sums of $1,539.31 and $1,027.33, in installments payable respectively at $17 and $33 per month; to pay the sum of $650 cash and the balance of $500 on October 1, 1943, with interest at 6 per cent; to pay the current and subsequent taxes and assessments. The cash payment was made and the purchaser entered into…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ebbert v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Oursler v. ThacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Ballard v. MacCallumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Whittier v. StegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pitt v. MallalieuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Sturm v. HeimArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Keelan v. Belmont Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API