Legal Opinion
Sturm v. Heim
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1964No. 7428PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JENNINGS, Justice.
On September 23, 1958, plaintiffs-appellants filed their complaint praying for specific performance of an agreement for the sale of real estate between appellants and defendants-appellees. Certain other relief was requested by appellants, but these prayers are not now at issue.
Appellees answered to the effect that appellants had forfeited all of their rights under the agreement and were barred by the statute of limitations. Appellees also filed a counterclaim to quiet title. Appellants filed a reply in the form of a general denial.
The case was tried to a jury, but the jury…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Major-Blakeney Corp. v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Fratt v. Daniels-Jones Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
- Glad Tidings Church of America v. HinkleyArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Alger v. Brighter Days Mining Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Clark v. Compania Ganadera De Cananea, S. A.Arizona Supreme Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bailey v. Montgomery Ward and CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Arizona Public Service Company v. BrittainArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Heth v. Del Webb's Highway InnArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- OS Stapley Company v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.